Service 02 — $2,500 setup + $3,000/month

SEO built for AI search

SEO and AEO run as one program: the technical work that wins Google rankings, plus the structure that makes AI engines cite you. $2,500 setup + $3,000/month.

Nationwide · remote-firstFree audit firstYou own what we build

What is AI search visibility?

AI search visibility is whether AI answer engines — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google's AI Overviews — name your business when someone asks a question you should be the answer to. It is measured in citations and brand mentions rather than ranking positions, because these engines return one synthesized answer instead of ten links. Winning it requires traditional SEO fundamentals (a site has to be crawlable and indexed to be retrievable at all) plus answer engine optimization: answer-first content structure, comprehensive schema markup, attributed statistics, and enough topical depth that an engine treats the site as a credible source.

Search changed shape. Someone with a problem you solve used to type a keyword and scan a page of links. Increasingly they ask an assistant, get one answer with two or three sources named, and act on it. The businesses named in that answer get the consideration. Everyone else isn't ranked lower — they're absent.

That's a different game from classic SEO, but it isn't a replacement for it. AI answer engines mostly retrieve from search indexes and then summarize. If Google can't crawl you, the AI can't cite you. So we run one program with two outputs: rank in search, and get quoted in answers.

Why AI answer engines cite some sites and ignore others

There's no ranking algorithm to reverse-engineer here, but the retrieval behavior is reasonably well understood, and it rewards specific, observable things.

What AI engines rewardWhat that means in practice
RetrievabilityThe page is crawlable, indexed, and fast. Nothing else matters if this fails.
Direct answersA clear, self-contained statement near the top that answers the question without requiring the rest of the page.
Parseable structureReal headings, real lists, real tables, and schema markup — not text baked into images or rendered only by JavaScript.
AttributionStatistics with named sources and dates. Unsourced numbers get discounted or dropped.
Topical depthMany strong pages on a subject, not one. Depth is a credibility signal.
Entity clarityThe engine can tell what your business is, does, and serves — because you stated it in structured data, not just prose.
FreshnessRecently published and updated content is preferentially retrieved for anything time-sensitive.

Most sites fail on structure and attribution, not on effort. They have good information written in a format that's hard for a machine to lift cleanly.

What we do

1. Audit — what Google sees and what AI says

We crawl the site the way a search engine does and record everything blocking indexation or diluting authority: broken canonicals, thin or duplicated pages, heading hierarchies that don't parse, missing or malformed structured data, slow Core Web Vitals, orphaned pages with no internal links.

Then we do the part most SEO audits skip: we ask the major AI engines the questions your buyers ask, and record what comes back. Who gets cited. Whether you're mentioned at all. Whether what they say about you is accurate — because an engine confidently describing your business wrong is its own problem.

You get both halves as a written findings document, free, before any engagement.

2. Fix the technical foundation

Nothing clever happens until the basics hold. We remediate crawl and index issues, restructure heading hierarchies so each page has exactly one H1 and a logical outline, fix canonical and redirect chains, get Core Web Vitals into the green, and build an internal linking structure that actually distributes authority instead of dead-ending in a nav menu.

3. Build the structured data layer

This is where most sites leave the most on the table. We implement a full schema.org graph with stable @id references — Organization, WebSite, WebPage, Service, Article, FAQPage, BreadcrumbList, and HowTo where it applies — so every entity cross-references correctly and a machine can resolve your business without inference.

We also ship the AI-specific layer: an llms.txt file describing what the site is and where the substantive content lives, explicit crawler permissions for GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and the rest, and speakable markup on the blocks designed to be quoted.

4. Restructure content to be citable

Existing pages get rebuilt around the answer-first pattern: state the answer in the first 60 words, then support it. Add the comparison tables and structured lists that get extracted cleanly. Attribute every statistic to a named, dated, linkable source. Add FAQ sections that match how people actually phrase questions, marked up so they're eligible for both featured snippets and AI extraction.

5. Run the content engine

One-off content doesn't build topical authority, and AI engines weight depth and freshness heavily. So we run a publishing engine — the same one running on this site — that ships consistent, sourced, genuinely useful pages against a keyword queue built from real search demand.

This is the part that compounds. It's also the part almost everyone abandons in month two, which is precisely why it works.

6. Measure both scoreboards

Traditional metrics — impressions, positions, clicks, conversions — plus AI-side tracking: how often the major engines cite your domain, what they say about your brand, and which competitors are getting named in the answers you want. When an engine describes your business inaccurately, that becomes a work item.

SEO vs. AEO vs. GEO — the terms, plainly

The vocabulary is a mess right now because the discipline is two years old. Practically:

Anyone selling AEO or GEO as a wholly separate product from SEO is selling you a rebrand. The technical foundation is shared. The content strategy diverges meaningfully. We price and run it as one program because splitting it produces worse results and a bigger invoice.

What it costs

$2,500 for the visibility audit and setup, then $3,000 a month, published. The setup fee covers the full technical and AI-visibility audit, the structured-data build, and the remediation plan; the monthly covers the content engine, ongoing technical work, citation tracking and reporting on both scoreboards. The audit findings are a standalone document you keep — if you take them to another agency or your own team, they're still worth the fee.

We publish the price because SEO retainers are the most quote-shaped market in marketing, and quote-shaped pricing rewards whoever guesses your budget best. Ours is the same number before we know it. If your situation genuinely needs less than the standard program — a technically sound site that only needs the content engine, say — the price follows the scope down at the audit, in writing.

Who this is a bad fit for

Worth saying plainly, because it saves everyone time:

Frequently asked questions

What is answer engine optimization?

Answer engine optimization (AEO) is the practice of structuring a website so AI answer engines cite it when generating answers. It differs from traditional SEO in its target: SEO competes for a ranking position a human clicks, while AEO competes to be the source an AI quotes inside its response. In practice it means answer-first content that states conclusions before explaining them, comprehensive schema.org markup, statistics attributed to named sources, FAQ structures matching real question phrasing, and enough topical depth for an engine to treat the site as authoritative. Generative engine optimization (GEO) describes the same discipline under a different name.

Is AEO different from SEO, or just a rebrand?

Both, honestly. The technical foundation is identical — a site must be crawlable, indexed and fast to be retrieved by either. What genuinely differs is content structure and measurement. SEO optimizes a page to win a keyword; AEO optimizes a passage to be extractable and quotable, and measures success in citations and brand mentions rather than positions. Agencies selling AEO as an entirely separate product are mostly repackaging SEO. Agencies claiming nothing has changed are ignoring a real shift in how people find businesses.

How long does SEO and AI search visibility take to work?

Technical fixes can show up in weeks — indexation problems, structured data, and page speed often produce measurable movement in the first month or two. Content-driven authority takes longer: meaningful ranking and citation gains typically appear between months four and nine, depending on how competitive the topic is and how much authority the domain already has. AI citations sometimes move faster than rankings, because a well-structured page on a specific question can get retrieved before it ever ranks in the top ten. Anyone promising results in 30 days is describing something other than SEO.

Can you guarantee I'll be cited by ChatGPT?

No, and nobody can. AI engines don't publish their retrieval logic, results vary between users and sessions, and the models change without notice. What we can do is control every input that demonstrably influences retrieval: making the site crawlable and fast, structuring content so it's cleanly extractable, marking up entities so machines resolve your business correctly, attributing statistics so they survive fact-checking, and building enough topical depth to be treated as a credible source. Then we measure citations over time and adjust. Treat any citation guarantee as a red flag.

Do I need SEO if I'm already running Google Ads?

They solve different problems. Paid search buys immediate, predictable traffic and stops the moment you stop paying. SEO and AEO build an asset that keeps returning traffic after the work is done, but takes months to mature. Most businesses that can afford both should run both — paid search for pipeline now, organic for the compounding base. If you can only fund one and you need revenue this quarter, run ads and revisit this later. We will tell you that in the audit if it's true.

What is llms.txt and does it actually matter?

llms.txt is a plain-text file at the root of a site that describes what the site is and links to its most substantive content, in a format designed for AI agents to read. It's an emerging convention, not a ratified standard, and no engine currently guarantees it will be honored. It costs almost nothing to ship, makes your content easier for an agent to navigate, and carries no downside — so we implement it, while being clear it's a small edge rather than the mechanism that gets you cited. The structural work and content quality do the heavy lifting.

Will you work with my existing site, or do I need a rebuild?

We work with what you have in the large majority of cases. Most sites don't need rebuilding — they need their structure, markup and content fixed. A rebuild becomes worth discussing only when the platform actively prevents the work: if you can't edit <head>, can't add structured data, or the site renders entirely client-side in a way that blocks crawling. We'll tell you in the audit which situation you're in, and we don't get paid more for recommending a rebuild.

How do you measure AI search visibility?

We track how frequently the major answer engines cite your domain when asked the questions your buyers ask, whether your brand gets mentioned even without a link, how accurately engines describe your business, and which competitors are being named in the answers you want to own. That runs alongside conventional reporting — impressions, average position, clicks and conversions from Search Console. Both scoreboards matter: rankings prove retrievability, citations prove credibility.

Find out where you actually stand.

The audit is free. We check what Google sees, what the AI engines say about you today, and where the gap is. You get the findings whether or not you hire us.

Book a free audit ↗